Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- U.S. FDA Grants Full Approval to Pfizer’s BRAFTOVI Combination Regimen in First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Pfizer)
- Oshi Health’s 2025 Impact Report Demonstrates Exceptional GI Outcomes and Cost Savings at Scale (PR Newswire)
- Medtronic announces CE Mark for the next generation GI Genius™ module and ColonPRO™ software (Medtronic)
- Allurion gets FDA nod for weight loss balloon (Mass Device)
- The 7 Must-Haves For The Doctor Of the 21st Century (The Medical Futurist)
- Will AI Eventually De-Skill Doctors? The Evidence Is Trickling In (Forbes)
- CRC Screening by Colonoscopy and FIT Improves Early Detection over Usual Care (Inside Precision Medicine)
- It’s Called the ‘Fitbit for Farts’—and It’s No Joke (The Wall Street Journal)
