Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Top Insights from The Scope Forward Show 2025
- Augmented Reality to Improve Ergonomics; Positive Stool Tests and Polyp Location (GI & Endoscopy News)
- Capsule Endoscopy (GI & Endoscopy News)
- Underused Method of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Could Improve Outcomes (Medscape)
- OpenAI launches ChatGPT Health, partners with b.well (MobiHealthNews)
- Freenome Delivers Improved Performance in Its Colorectal Cancer Blood Test with Sensitivity of 85% for CRC and 22% for Advanced Precancerous Lesions (Freenome)
- Ro Launches Wegovy® Pill Through Integration with Novo Nordisk (Ro)
- The impact of the GI physician shortage (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
