Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Congratulations Dr. Kim on new AAAHC leadership position (AGA)
- When RVUs Go Wrong: Red Flags for Physicians (Medscape)
- GI Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Linked to Colon Adenoma Risk (GI & Hepatology News)
- Would You Track Your Stools Like You Track Your Steps? (Bloomberg)
- Good news, bad news for gastroenterology (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- Addressing Colonoscopy Burden due to Artificial Intelligence Devices for Polyp Detection (Gastro Journal)
- Gastro Center of Maryland Expands to Bethesda and Silver Spring, Broadening Access to GI Care in the DMV (USA Today)
- To Improve CRC Screening in Patients Aged 45-49, Just Send Them a FIT Kit (GI & Endoscopy News)
