Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Who Adopts AI First: Endoscopists or Humanoid Robots?
- Quest Diagnostics to offer liver cancer blood test (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- Greater Scope: Doctors Get Inside Look at Gut Health With AI-Powered Endoscopy (NVIDIA)
- State of AI in Medicine (Doximity)
- Abbott Acquisition Of Exact Sciences Refocuses Growth On Cancer Diagnostics (Simply Wall Street)
- Will the ‘gestalt’ matter less in GI surgery? (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- Advancing Multidisciplinary Strategies for Obesity Care (AJMC)
- 5 studies scaring gastroenterologists (Becker’s ASC Review)
