Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- ‘Tremendous implications’: Hospital affiliation linked to higher-cost care (Healio)
- Omada Health Launches AI-Powered Meal Map to Transform Nutrition for Cardiometabolic Patients (HIT Consultant)
- 10 Must-Read Posts in GI Oncology This Week (OncoDaily)
- SCA Health expands GI footprint, physician network in 2025 (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- 7 key numbers on the state of GI in 2025 (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- White House Unveils ‘TrumpRx’ Drug-Buying Site and a Pfizer Pricing Deal (The Wall Street Journal)
- CADe for Colonoscopy: Positive and Negative Takeaways From Largest Real-World Study (GI & Endoscopy News)
- FDA OKs Tremfya for Ulcerative Colitis (GI & Hepatology News)