Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Why Have All the Doctors Gone? Insights Into Early Clinical Departure Among Physicians in the United States: A National Survey (The Permanente Journal )
- Subcutaneous Guselkumab Meets Week 12 Endpoint In Ulcerative Colitis (ReachMD)
- Virtual Colonoscopies Expand Colorectal Cancer Screening Possibilities (HealthCity)
- 10 prior authorization changes physicians should watch (Medical Economics)
- Lawmakers mull Medicare physician pay reform to tamp down consolidation (Healthcare Dive)
- Magnetic neuromodulation reduced fecal incontinence (GI & Hepatology News)
- Layering Weight-Loss Medications With Surgery and Other Tips for Obesity Management (GI & Endoscopy News)
- The $500K Club (Medscape)
