Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- AI-Assisted Colonoscopy and the Diminutive Adenoma Dilemma (Los Angeles Times)
- BE Surveillance, Outpatient ESD, and More (GI & Endoscopy News)
- HHS-OIG Issues Favorable Advisory Opinion for Free Multi-Cancer Detection Supplemental Reports Provided with Medicare-Covered Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests (The National Law Review)
- Physician–researcher’s work yields landmark five-year data for Crohn’s disease drug (Medical Xpress)
- CU Anschutz Biobank Partners with Tech Company to Advance Gut Research and Patient Care (The Regents of the University of Colorado)
- Novant Health adds leading gastroenterology clinicians to its Lowcountry network (Novant Health)
- Solutions Emerging for Post-GLP-1 Weight Regain (Medscape)
- CMS Grants Medicare Coverage for ColoSense®, Expanding Access to Simplified Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening (Business Wire)
