Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- EndoQuest Robotics Announces Completion of Enrollment in the PARADIGM Trial (Business Wire)
- A single blood sample may improve the prediction of colorectal cancer recurrence or metastasis, kaist study finds (EurekAlert)
- At-Home Colorectal Cancer Tests Are Not a One-and-Done Deal (Cancer Health)
- How AI clears the way for colonoscopy screening (American Medical Association)
- Inside Diverticulitis: What Gastroenterologists Need to Know (Medscape)
- Abbott reports diagnostics growth since $21B Exact Sciences buy (Medtech Dive)
- Video Capsule Endoscopy Has Widening Role Beyond Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Bleeding (GI & Endoscopy News)
- How the AGA Incubator is shaping the future of digestive health (AGA)
