Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- This is your doctor on ChatGPT (Business Insider)
- Experts’ Practices Vary in Managing Barrett Esophagus (Medscape)
- 6 Gastroenterology Headlines You Missed in October 2025 (HCP Live)
- The Clinician’s Guide to Breaking Into Digital Health (Massively Better Healthcare)
- UnitedHealthcare pays Optum doctors more than other doctors: study (Healthcare Dive)
- American Gastroenterological Association and MATTER welcome 11 startups to inaugural incubator (MATTER)
- Tri Century Eye Care & Pittsburgh Gastroenterology Associates Announce Data Breaches (The HIPAA Journal)
- Five ways for independent GI practices to prepare for payment cuts (AGA)
