Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Finding freedom as a physician through entrepreneurship (American Medical Association)
- Regulatory burdens continue to mount for physician practices (Fierce Healthcare)
- The unconventional players in the physician acquisition game (Becker’s ASC Review)
- Why Gastroenterology Is One of the Most In-Demand Locums Specialties (Hayes Locums)
- Snailing colorectal cancer drug delivery, once and for all (BioTechniques)
- Goodbye colonoscopy? New stool test detects 90% of colorectal cancers (Science Daily)
- CBT for IBS: A Frontline Treatment, Not Adjunct Therapy (Gastroenterology Advisor)
- Clinical practice update: Electrosurgery guidance refines endoscopy practice (GI & Hepatology News)
