Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Patients now shop for doctors like consumers, and the bar just got higher (Medical Economics)
- AI in GI cancer care: From recognition to clinical value (ESMO)
- Could the Gut Microbiome Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening? (Technology Networks)
- DDW Expert Picks: Endoscopists’ Peripheral Gaze, Antibiotics for Cholangitis, and More (GI & Endoscopy News)
- The loopholes PE built to buy physicians are starting to crack (Becker’s Healthcare)
- Barrett Esophagus May Strike Decades Before Official Diagnosis (Medscape)
- A blood-based test for detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer (DENEB): a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study (The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
- AI can analyze your poop. Should it? (Business Insider)
