With anticipation running high in the healthcare sector over upcoming election outcomes, potential shifts in healthcare policy could influence how care is delivered and funded, ultimately affecting investment dynamics in both public and private markets. In a four-part series examining these implications, policy expert Julie Barnes set the stage by discussing possible policy directions under different election results. In Part 2, Richard Close, Managing Director of Digital and Tech-Enabled Health Equity Research at Canaccord Genuity, joins Keith Figlioli to explore how these potential changes might shape healthcare investing.
Trending
- Digital self-management programme for pain, fatigue and faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial (BMJ)
- Clinicians Encouraged to ‘See C. diff Differently’ as Diagnostics, Resistance Patterns, and Therapeutic Tools Shift (GI & Endoscopy News)
- AGA, ACG Express Concerns About New American Cancer Society Recommendations (GI & Endoscopy News)
- In vitro development of the Autonomous Colonoscope Robot System (ACRS) for fully automated colonoscope insertion (Nature)
- Zobair Younossi, MD, on Global Consensus Recommendations for MASLD/MASH (HMP Global Learning Network )
- Recommending Blood Tests for CRC Without Guardrails Risks Confusion (MedPage Today)
- Gut Microbiome Could Remain Disrupted For Over a Decade After Polyp Removal (ScienceAlert)
- Why physician is not the same as provider (KevinMD)
