Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Cylinder Health strengthens gut-brain leadership with new Head of Gut-Brain Health and Clinical Advisory Board appointment (Cylinder Health)
- The new era of physician independence (Medical Economics)
- “Don’t Take Shortcuts,” Endoscopy Researcher Advises (GI & Hepatology News)
- Olympus Unveils Corporate Strategy (Olympus)
- Unlocking value creation in healthcare: How AI can reverse private equity’s return challenges – Part 1: HealthTech and tech-enabled services (Lexology)
- 5 highest-paid gastroenterologists in New York City (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- And Your 2025 Healio Disruptive Innovators Are … (Healio)
- The Hype and Limits of At-Home Gut Microbiome Tests (U.S. News)
