Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Iterative Health Closes $77 Million Series C to Accelerate the Future of Clinical Research (Business Wire)
- Private Equity vs. Independent Medicine: When Wall Street Enters the Exam Room (Working Healthcare – the Podcast Fixing Healthcare)
- Artificial Intelligence Is Not the End of the Physician (JAMA)
- Charted: The most (and least) burned out physician specialties (Advisory Board)
- Growth, practice value and mergers: A strategic guide for physicians (Medical Economics)
- The potential ‘litigation wave’ headed for GI (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- Groundbreaking new study shows real-time AI platform better at diagnosing cancer than biopsy (UMass Chan Medical School)
- Investigational endoscopic therapy maintains weight after GLP-1 discontinuation (GI & Hepatology News)
