Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- Digital self-management programme for pain, fatigue and faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial (BMJ)
- Clinicians Encouraged to ‘See C. diff Differently’ as Diagnostics, Resistance Patterns, and Therapeutic Tools Shift (GI & Endoscopy News)
- AGA, ACG Express Concerns About New American Cancer Society Recommendations (GI & Endoscopy News)
- In vitro development of the Autonomous Colonoscope Robot System (ACRS) for fully automated colonoscope insertion (Nature)
- Zobair Younossi, MD, on Global Consensus Recommendations for MASLD/MASH (HMP Global Learning Network )
- Recommending Blood Tests for CRC Without Guardrails Risks Confusion (MedPage Today)
- Gut Microbiome Could Remain Disrupted For Over a Decade After Polyp Removal (ScienceAlert)
- Why physician is not the same as provider (KevinMD)
