Delays in cancer registry reporting may have skewed the findings of the NordICC trial, which evaluated the long-term impact of screening colonoscopies. The trial, involving over 85,000 adults, excluded 221 participants with pre-existing colorectal cancer (CRC) that hadn’t yet appeared in registries—raising questions about the accuracy of reported outcomes. Researchers estimate that 2-3 year delays may have masked the true effectiveness of colonoscopies, showing a lower impact on CRC prevention than reality. If registration had been timely, risk reductions and outcomes could have been significantly better, suggesting a need for deeper investigation. What else might this delay reveal about the real power of colonoscopies?
Trending
- AI Companion Tool Identifies Food Triggers Based on IBS Sensitivity Testing (CLP)
- British startup BoobyBiome raises €2.8 million for infant health with breast milk microbiome breakthrough (EU-Startups)
- Locum tenens: Reclaiming purpose, autonomy, and financial freedom in medicine (KevinMD)
- Getting Ahead of Gastrointestinal Cancer (Medscape)
- Can AI and Molecular Testing Outperform Colonoscopy? (The Pathologist)
- Precision Gastroenterology: Harnessing Personalized Medicine for Transformative Patient Care (ASGE)
- Transforming Colonoscopy: The Role of Mechanical Enhancements in Boosting Polyp Detection Rates (ReachMD)
- Health Insurance Premiums To Rise Well Above Inflation For Most Americans (Forbes)