AI’s so-called black box refers to the fact that much of the underlying technology behind machine learning-enhanced algorithms is probability/statistics without a human readable explanation. Oftentimes that’s the case because the advanced math or the data science behind the algorithms is too complex for the average user to understand without additional training. Several stakeholders in digital health maintain, however, that this lack of understanding isn’t that important. They argue that as long as an algorithm generates actionable insights, most clinicians don’t really care about what’s “under the hood.” Is that reasoning sound?
Trending
- Digital self-management programme for pain, fatigue and faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial (BMJ)
- Clinicians Encouraged to ‘See C. diff Differently’ as Diagnostics, Resistance Patterns, and Therapeutic Tools Shift (GI & Endoscopy News)
- AGA, ACG Express Concerns About New American Cancer Society Recommendations (GI & Endoscopy News)
- In vitro development of the Autonomous Colonoscope Robot System (ACRS) for fully automated colonoscope insertion (Nature)
- Zobair Younossi, MD, on Global Consensus Recommendations for MASLD/MASH (HMP Global Learning Network )
- Recommending Blood Tests for CRC Without Guardrails Risks Confusion (MedPage Today)
- Gut Microbiome Could Remain Disrupted For Over a Decade After Polyp Removal (ScienceAlert)
- Why physician is not the same as provider (KevinMD)
