The CHRONICLE trial from Germany suggests that cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) may be safer than hot EMR for large colorectal polyps, with significantly fewer major adverse events. However, this comes with a trade-off: higher rates of polyp recurrence and residual adenoma. While cold EMR shows promise for certain polyp types, especially sessile serrated lesions, further research is needed to refine patient selection and techniques to reduce recurrence rates.
Trending
- GI 2.0: The Playbook | Chapter 8 | The AI-Native GI Practice
- The physician referral black hole is swallowing your growth (BPD)
- Could corporate medicine be on the way out? Inside the new federal bill (MDLinx)
- Retatrutide, a Triple Hormone Receptor Agonist, for Treatment of Obesity (The New England Journal of Medicine)
- Microbiome Holds Biomarker Predictive of CRC Recurrence (GI & Endoscopy News)
- Are You Performing Second Inspection of the Right Colon? (GI & Endoscopy News)
- The AI Is in the Scope. The Evidence Isn’t. (CDO Trends Weekly)
- Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (Medscape)
