The CHRONICLE trial from Germany suggests that cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) may be safer than hot EMR for large colorectal polyps, with significantly fewer major adverse events. However, this comes with a trade-off: higher rates of polyp recurrence and residual adenoma. While cold EMR shows promise for certain polyp types, especially sessile serrated lesions, further research is needed to refine patient selection and techniques to reduce recurrence rates.
Trending
- Patients now shop for doctors like consumers, and the bar just got higher (Medical Economics)
- AI in GI cancer care: From recognition to clinical value (ESMO)
- Could the Gut Microbiome Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening? (Technology Networks)
- DDW Expert Picks: Endoscopists’ Peripheral Gaze, Antibiotics for Cholangitis, and More
- The loopholes PE built to buy physicians are starting to crack (Becker’s Healthcare)
- Barrett Esophagus May Strike Decades Before Official Diagnosis (Medscape)
- A blood-based test for detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer (DENEB): a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study (The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
- AI can analyze your poop. Should it? (Business Insider)
