The CHRONICLE trial from Germany suggests that cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) may be safer than hot EMR for large colorectal polyps, with significantly fewer major adverse events. However, this comes with a trade-off: higher rates of polyp recurrence and residual adenoma. While cold EMR shows promise for certain polyp types, especially sessile serrated lesions, further research is needed to refine patient selection and techniques to reduce recurrence rates.
Trending
- The biggest GI disruptions to prepare for in 2026 (Becker’s GI & Endoscopy)
- Colonoscopy Delay Up to 24 Months After Positive FIT Not Tied to Added CRC Risk (Medscape)
- Addressing the psychological impacts of inflammatory bowel disease (Penn Today)
- Beneath the Surface: ‘Start low, go slow’ when prescribing GLP-1 therapies (Healio)
- Preventing Ergonomic Injuries In the Endoscopy Suite (GI & Endoscopy News)
- Visual Estimation Inaccurate for Measuring Colorectal Polyps (GI & Endoscopy News)
- High Adherence to Repeat Multitarget Stool DNA Testing and Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Average-Risk United States Adults: Results from a Nationally Insured Cohort (Clinical Therapeutics)
- Is It Time To Equip Our Toilets With Health Sensors? (The Medical Futurist)
